The Zipper Problem: Why Powerful Men Keep Ending Their Own Careers
By Barry O’Connell
Maryland Wire
In American politics, the most predictable scandal is also the most avoidable. It crosses parties, states, ideologies, and generations. It has ended the careers of governors, congressmen, and rising stars. It has shortened lives, destroyed marriages, and reshaped political landscapes.
Call it what it is: the zipper problem — the recurring pattern of powerful men who sabotage their own futures because they cannot maintain appropriate boundaries in their personal lives.
This isn’t about guilt or innocence in any particular allegation. It’s about the structural vulnerability that emerges when men in positions of authority blur the line between professional responsibility and personal desire. And the fallout is remarkably consistent.
A Pattern With No Partisan Preference
New York: A Trilogy of Self‑Inflicted Wounds
New York has produced some of the most visible examples of political implosion:
- Andrew Cuomo, who resigned after the state Attorney General concluded he had violated harassment laws. Cuomo denied criminal wrongdoing but acknowledged that some of his behavior was inappropriate.
- Eliot Spitzer, who admitted to involvement with a prostitution ring and stepped down in 2008.
- Anthony Weiner, who acknowledged inappropriate communications and resigned from Congress before later pleading guilty to a federal charge.
Different circumstances, same trajectory: private behavior detonating public careers.
Virginia: Justin Fairfax
Fairfax’s case involved disputed allegations, not admissions. But the political effect was identical: a once‑promising statewide figure whose career was consumed by accusations he could not escape.
California: Eric Swalwell
Swalwell has not admitted wrongdoing, but the swirl of allegations and political pressure was enough to push him out of the governor’s race. In modern politics, the allegation alone can be career‑altering.
Republicans Are Not Exempt
There is no partisan monopoly on self‑destruction:
- Mark Sanford, who publicly acknowledged an extramarital affair after disappearing from the state for several days.
- Larry Craig, who pled guilty to disorderly conduct in a Minneapolis airport restroom sting.
- Dennis Hastert, whose misconduct was confirmed in federal court filings.
The details differ. The pattern does not.
Why This Keeps Happening
Political life creates a combustible mix:
- long hours
- intense emotional bonding
- proximity to ambitious staff
- ego inflation
- the illusion of invulnerability
- the belief that private behavior will stay private
Insiders often say, half‑jokingly, that “rockstars aren’t the only ones with groupies.”
The attention is real. The temptation is real. And for some men, the boundary‑keeping is not.
What feels consensual, harmless, or private in the moment can later be reframed as inappropriate, exploitative, or politically toxic. Careers collapse not only because of what happened — but because of how it looks, how it’s interpreted, and how it’s weaponized.
The Maryland Case: A Familiar Storm Gathering
Maryland now faces its own version of this recurring drama — an unnamed official whose private decisions are becoming a public liability.
What is known, and safe to say:
- The man is alleged to have had concurrent affairs with two subordinates.
- One of the women has reportedly told coworkers she doesn’t have to follow instructions because she is “protected” by her relationship with the top boss.
- Whether her claim is true or not, the appearance of favoritism is politically poisonous.
- Her bragging creates workplace resentment, fuels rumors, and places the man in a position where even innocent decisions look compromised.
This is how careers implode:
Not always because of the act itself, but because of the perception, the power imbalance, and the erosion of trust inside the organization.
Even if every interaction were consensual, the optics alone can be fatal.
The Real Warning
This is not a morality tale. It is a political one.
When a man in public life:
- mixes personal and professional relationships
- allows boundaries to blur
- creates the appearance of favoritism
- or lets a subordinate boast about special access
…he is not just risking embarrassment.
He is risking his career, his reputation, and sometimes his future.
The zipper problem is not new.
But in the modern media environment — with social media, opposition research, and a 24‑hour news cycle — it is more dangerous than ever.
And for some men, including the unnamed Maryland official, the window to correct the behavior is closing fast.



I think you forget to mention Donald Trump.
Men behaving badly isn’t new. But it is remarkable in the world we occupy: surveillance state, social media, and over sharing culture, that men develop amnesia around these facts or their sense of misplaced entitlement: somehow penis ownership makes them immune to any fall out or consequence from said bad behavior. Mostly it’s just so boring and predictable.